Skip to content
American Justice Notebook
Menu
  • Home
  • About The Editor/Publisher
  • Notes – Cases – Thoughts & Quotes
  • Contact’/Subscribe
Menu

Home Depot Pays $2 Million to Settle Lawsuit Alleging Overcharging and False Advertising

Posted on September 12, 2024

SAN DIEGO, CA-

Home Depot will pay $1,977,251 to settle a civil law enforcement complaint alleging the company engaged in false advertising and unfair competition, officials announced Thursday.

“False advertising and unfair competition are serious offenses that undermine consumer trust and distort the marketplace,” District Attorney Gascón said. “When companies engage in deceptive practices, they not only cheat consumers but also gain an unjust advantage over businesses that operate ethically and transparently. This settlement is a clear message that such behavior will not be tolerated and underscores our commitment to safeguarding the rights of consumers in our community.”

The company did not admit wrongdoing. It was cooperative in the investigation and has taken steps to correct the violations.

West Virginia Woman Took Top Secrets, Committed KidnappingThe civil complaint alleged that Home Depot charged customers prices higher than Home Depot’s lowest advertised or posted price.

Often called a “scanner violation,” this problem occurs when the price on the item or on the item’s shelf tag is not the same once the UPC code is scanned at the point-of-sale device or register.

Under a judgment negotiated with the company entered on Aug. 26 in San Diego County Superior Court and signed by Judge Richard S. Whitney, Home Depot was prohibited from engaging in false or misleading advertising and charging an amount greater than the lowest price posted for an item. 

The judgment adheres to California’s pricing accuracy requirements and requires the implementation of a price accuracy program, which adds more audits and training and eliminates price increases on weekend days, officials stated.

The judgment requires Home Depot to pay $1,700,000 in civil penalties and $277,251 in costs and restitution to cover investigation costs and support future enforcement of consumer protection laws.

The San Diego County District Attorney’s Consumer Protection Unit, LADA’s Consumer Protection Division, and the District Attorneys of Alameda, Orange, San Bernardino, and Sonoma counties all filed the lawsuit in San Diego Superior Court.

COURT INFORMATION LINKS:

US SUPREME COURT FEDERAL COURT WEBSITE LINKS FBI PRESS RELEASES / MOST WANTED CIA PRESS RELEASES / LIBRARY DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / PRESS RELEASES FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION: HOW TO HIRE A LAWYER FEDERAL COUNTER TERRORISM GUIDE AMERICAN COURTHOUSE INFORMATION

NEWS SOURCES:

THE GUARDIAN CNN NEWS COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE THE NEW REPUBLIC HUFFINGTON POST CBS NEWS MSNBC NEWS MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA CENTER FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY NPR NEWS INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH BBC ROLLING STONE FACTCHECK.ORG

TODAY'S QUOTE

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power." — Abraham Lincoln

INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM

PROPUBLICA INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM REPORTS

“The Founding Fathers gave the free press the protection it must have to bare the secrets of government and inform the people.” – Justice Hugo Black

THE WHISTLEBLOWER

©2026 American Justice Notebook | Design: Newspaperly WordPress Theme