********************************
JUST SAYING
BY RAUL HERNANDEZ
Jim Acosta shredded this Trump stooge with precision, exposing the sycophantic absurdity with all the grace of a seasoned surgeon wielding a scalpel. Acosta embodies what journalism should be: fearless, incisive, and unwilling to bow to power at a time when much of the corporate media has tucked its tail between its legs and scampered off into the shadows.
He is a professional to his core, a journalist with integrity, in a field that increasingly feels like it’s circling the drain.
After 30 years in the trenches as a newspaper reporter, I saw the rot setting in firsthand. Journalism was morphing into something lazy, shallow, and allergic to tough questions. The “news” was becoming a circus of entertainment masquerading as reporting, pandering to audiences with the attention span of Rhesus monkeys with hands glued to smartphones.
The days of pit-bull journalism—dogged, relentless, and unrelenting—were fading faster than buffalo nickels.
Newsrooms became digital Disneylands, where the focus shifted to fluff, trends, and titillation rather than digging deep for hard-hitting investigative pieces.
Reporters used to chase down stories that mattered: exposing the corrupt clownery in City Hall, taking down corporate predators preying on the public, or spotlighting systemic abuses in policing and governance. Those bylines meant something—they changed the world, shone a light where it was desperately needed, and gave a voice to the voiceless.
Now? Newsrooms are cash cows, more concerned with profit margins and ad revenues than serving the public trust. Billionaires like Jeff Bezos snatch up newspapers and networks, transforming them into platforms for personal agendas or tools for insatiable greed. The whole enterprise feels like it’s sold its soul, leaving behind a hollow shell.
The final straw came when I realized the passion—the bonfire that had fueled me for decades—was being extinguished. Every uninspired, mealy-mouthed editor and pencil-pushing manager seemed to line up to piss on my bonfire with mediocrity.
By 2013, what had once been a roaring blaze of purpose had dwindled to a flicker, and it was time to walk away.
Despite the grueling hours and relentless hustle, the stories I poured my heart into—exposing municipal and police corruption, discrimination, and courthouse injustice—were being gutted, diluted, or outright shelved. It wasn’t just frustrating; it was soul-crushing.
Editors, who once championed the truth no matter the fallout, were growing timid, tiptoeing around controversy like it was a landmine. They weren’t just afraid of upsetting corporate interests—they were terrified of ruffling the feathers of an ever-dwindling subscriber base.
In an era when subscriptions circled the drain, the newsrooms’ courage seemed to evaporate overnight. Hard-hitting journalism—the kind that should make the powerful squirm—was sacrificed on the altar of appeasement, leaving stories of real consequence to die in the shadows. It was a betrayal, not just of the craft, but of the public trust journalism is supposed to serve.
But seeing journalists like Acosta refusing to play along, refusing to accept the mediocrity and cowardice that has infected the industry, rekindles a flicker of hope.
Maybe, just maybe, there’s still a fight worth waging in the field I once loved.