{"id":28961,"date":"2017-01-20T20:47:05","date_gmt":"2017-01-21T04:47:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cjnotebook.com\/?p=28961"},"modified":"2017-01-20T20:47:05","modified_gmt":"2017-01-21T04:47:05","slug":"l-council-members-call-closer-look-lapds-often-criticized-disciplinary-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/cjnotebook.com\/?p=28961","title":{"rendered":"L.A. council members call for closer look at LAPD’s often-criticized disciplinary system"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"los<\/span><\/p>\n

\"Kate<\/span><\/p>\n

Kate Mather<\/a><\/span><\/span><\/div>\n
Contact Reporter<\/a><\/span><\/div>\n

As City Hall pushes a proposal that could\u00a0give civilians a greater role in disciplining Los Angeles police<\/a> officers, city\u00a0lawmakers on Friday called for a closer examination of the police department\u2019s often-criticized disciplinary system that could open the door to further changes.<\/span><\/p>\n

City Council President Herb Wesson introduced a motion calling for a series of reports and community meetings about the L.A. Police Department\u2019s so-called Board of Rights panels, noting that procedures haven\u2019t\u00a0been \u201cthoroughly reviewed and evaluated\u201d in more than two decades.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0If approved by the council, Wesson\u2019s motion would also direct city agencies to explore how to expand the pool of civilians hired to weigh\u00a0discipline cases and ways to increase transparency surrounding\u00a0the proceedings, which are kept secret under state law.<\/span><\/div>\n

Vanessa Rodriguez, a spokeswoman for Wesson, said he introduced the new motion to ensure that the proposal already on the table \u2014 which could give civilians a greater role in disciplining officers \u2014 \u201cwasn\u2019t done in a vacuum.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt has to be an ongoing conversation,\u201d she said. \u201cDepending on what he hears from the community in these various town hall forums, I think that will facilitate the\u00a0city\u2019s next steps.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

The move comes days before the City Council is poised to vote on language for a May ballot measure<\/a> that, if passed by voters, would allow officers facing serious discipline to have their cases heard by an all-civilian board. Under the current system, Board of Rights panels are made up of two high-ranking officers and only one civilian.<\/span><\/p>\n

If Wesson\u2019s motion is approved in committee Monday, the council could vote on the motions a day later. Mayor Eric Garcetti<\/a> has expressed support for both.<\/span><\/p>\n

Offering all-civilian boards would mark perhaps the most significant change to the LAPD\u2019s disciplinary system in decades \u2014\u00a0one that has long been sought by the union representing rank-and-file officers.<\/span><\/p>\n

But the proposal\u00a0has drawn criticism from some community groups and LAPD observers, who argued that the department\u2019s disciplinary system needed a larger overhaul with more public input.<\/span><\/p>\n

On Thursday, four groups \u2014\u00a0the Community Coalition, the American Civil Liberties Union, Los Angeles Community Action Network and the L.A. branch of the Black Lives Matter movement \u2014\u00a0urged Wesson and Garcetti to scrap the proposed ballot initiative.<\/span><\/p>\n

Those affiliated with the coalition\u00a0argued that qualifications\u00a0for the civilians who sit on the disciplinary boards unfairly exclude most\u00a0Angelenos. Some\u00a0accused the union of looking for softer punishments for cops, pointing to a city analysis that showed the civilian members were \u201cconsistently more lenient\u201d<\/a> than their sworn counterparts and frequently voted to acquit the accused\u00a0officers or dole out lesser punishments.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThis isn\u2019t real civilian oversight,\u201d said Peter Bibring, a senior staff attorney for the ACLU of Southern California. \u201cThis is just going to make it harder for officers to be disciplined for misconduct and harder to hold anybody accountable for that failure.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

LAPD Chief Charlie Beck has also raised concerns about the potential for all-civilian disciplinary panels. He recently told reporters that although he was \u201cmore than willing\u201d to find ways to improve the disciplinary process, he thought removing sworn officers from the hearings would also take away valuable insight into the LAPD\u2019s procedures and expectations for officers.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s an old system,\u201d Beck said. \u201cI think it needs a lot of discussion before we do anything. There is much at risk.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Under the current system, Beck must send any officer\u00a0he wants to fire to a Board of Rights hearing.\u00a0If the panel determines the officer is guilty of the accusations, it then recommends whether to fire the officer or assign a\u00a0lesser penalty, such as a suspension. The chief can accept or reduce the punishment, but not increase its severity.<\/span><\/p>\n

Officials with the union representing about 9,800 rank-and-file LAPD officers contend that the boards can be unfairly swayed by favoritism within the department \u2014\u00a0or by the chief\u2019s influence over the two officers who sit on each panel.\u00a0Civilians can look\u00a0at the cases more objectively, they argue, without pressure from the police chief.<\/span><\/p>\n

Wesson\u2019s latest proposal acknowledged the complaints about the LAPD\u2019s disciplinary system from inside and outside the department. It also noted a recent surge in lawsuits settled by the city, including some stemming from police officers\u2019 actions.<\/span><\/p>\n

The City Council moved this week to issue a bond borrowing up to $70 million to help pay off mounting legal settlements and court judgment costs. Last month, the city agreed to pay $8 million to end lawsuits related to three fatal shootings by LAPD officers.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cRepairing the disciplinary system can be a significant factor in increasing the trust between the public and the city,\u201d Wesson\u2019s motion read. \u201cThat increased trust can and should lead to a reduced number of jury awards and settlement payouts.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Karren Lane, vice president of policy for the South L.A.-based Community Coalition, said that her organization was encouraged by the motion introduced Friday and the community input it called for. But, she said, council members should table further action on the proposed ballot measure until they get more information.<\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of questions that need to be answered,\u201d she said. \u201cBut then the City Council is considering supporting a ballot measure to change our City Charter without answering those questions.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

Times staff writers Dakota Smith and David Zahniser contributed to this report.<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n